The Turn in Economics: Neoclassical Dominance to Mainstream Pluralism?
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper investigates whether since the 1980s neoclassical economics has been in the process of being supplanted as the dominant research programme in economics by a collection of competing research approaches which share relatively little in common with each other or with neoclassical economics. A shortlist of the new approaches in recent economics includes game theory, experimental economics, behavioral economics, evolutionary economics, neuroeconomics, and non-linear complexity theory. Two hypotheses are advanced – one regarding the relation between economics instruction and economics research and one regarding the nature of the economics research frontier – to describe social-institutional practices that contribute to the replication of economics as a field. Two further hypotheses are advanced – one regarding the boundaries of the field and one regarding how the field appraises itself – to create a historical–methodological framework for evaluating the question of change in economics and change in recent economics in particular. Finally, the paper distinguishes three leading explanations – the ‘breakdown’ view, the ‘takeover’ view, and the ‘maturity’ view – of why neoclassical economics no longer dominates a mainstream economics.
منابع مشابه
Democracy and sustainable development: Implications for science and economics
Sustainable development is a contested concept in that it is interpreted differently by different actors. A distinction has been made between “weak” and “strong” sustainability. Some have referred to three aspects or “pillars” of sustainable development; economic, social and environmental. Others have advocated a further broadening of the kinds of dimensions to be considered. The present author...
متن کاملTheoretical Integration of New Institutional Economics
The purpose of this study is to investigate the theoretical integration or eclecticism of New Institutional Economics (NIE) on the basis of the four-stage Tillings model. The first step demonstrates that the new institutionalists, as to confront the hegemonic scientific mainstream, stated that their goal was to moderate neoclassical assumptions, but in fact, their main goal was to expand and st...
متن کاملWorld Economics Association Newsletter Editorial: Why Pluralism Stuart Birks 2 Message from Edward Fullbrook 2
The crisis makes clear that the effort of the mainstream in economic thinking to ignore or even suppress differing voices can have disastrous social consequences. There could, therefore, be no better time to build an institution like the World Economics Association that would encourage and project such voices." C. P. Chandrasekhar, Jawaharlal Nehru University " Today, economics needs methodolog...
متن کاملScience, ideology and development:
The reasons why we as scholars prefer one paradigm to another are not only scientific but also ideological. It is suggested that pluralism should be discussed at the levels of theory of science, paradigms in economics and ideological orientations. Neoclassical economics is closely connected with logical positivism as a theory of science and is close to Neo-liberalism as an ideological orientati...
متن کاملNotability of Substantive Elements of Economics, in Groundwork of Evolution of Economic Thought
This paper is investigating that:" resurging evolution of economic thought, EET, is brilliantly in direction with eminence of substantive elements of economics itself". It presupposes that the substantive elements of economics embraces the following package: 1- maintaining on some epistemic doctrines, including rationality, efficiency and equilibrium.2-dynamic characteristic of economic theorie...
متن کامل